City of Buffalo v. J. W. Clement Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtScileppi, J.
This is a case of first impression which requires that we consider in detail the somewhat amorphous and apparently perplexing concept of de facto appropriation in the hope of clearly defining and firmly establishing its perimeters. Specifically, we have before us the question of whether there can be a de facto taking absent a physical invasion or the imposition of some direct legal restraint. Needless to say, the dictates *248of precedent, practicality and public policy guide us in seeking a just result.
On or about December 10, 1954, J. W. Clement Company received notice of a hearing to be held…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Danforth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Jacobs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Phelps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Jackson v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by248 opinions
- Hooper Associates Ltd. v. AGS Computers, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Buzz Stew, LLC v. City of North Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- A. G. Ship Maintenance Corp. v. LezakNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Klopping v. City of WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Fred F. French Investing Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
243 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.