Legal Opinion

Commonwealth's Crosstown Expressway Appeal

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 12, 1971No. Appeal No. 999 Tr. Dkt. 1970PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

President Judge Bowman,

This is an appeal by the Department of Highways (now the Department of Transportation) from the lower court’s dismissal of its preliminary objections to the appointment of viewers. The question on appeal is whether the lower court properly concluded that the well pleaded averments of a property owner’s petition for the appointment of viewers are legally sufficient to state a cause of action for compensable injury by reason of a de faeto taking. We are without the benefit of the lower court’s reasoning in concluding as it did in that it has not filed a brief…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Griggs v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Stahl v. First Pennsylvania Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Griggs v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Philadelphia ParkwaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  5. Commonwealth AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Conroy-Prugh Glass Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Jacobs v. Nether Providence TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. In re 1301 Filbert Ltd. PartnershipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. City of Chicago v. LoitzIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Rawls v. Central Bucks Joint School Building AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API