Hamer v. State Highway Commission of the Missouri
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
STOCKARD, Commissioner.
Plaintiff has appealed from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his petition for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Jurisdiction is in this court because by his petition plaintiff seeks damages in the amount of $148,-000, Harris v. Bates, 364 Mo. 1023, 270 S.W.2d 763, and also, because the determination of the issues in this case necessarily involves the construction of Article I, Section 26, Constitution of Missouri, V.A.M.S., Midwest Bible & Missionary Institute v. Sestric, 364 Mo. 167, 260 S.W.2d 25.
We need to set out only the substance…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Rigney v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
- Chicago v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Miller v. Beaver FallsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Gasque v. Town of ConwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
- Harris v. Bates Ex Rel. CurrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Hilltop Properties, Inc. v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- City of Houston v. BiggersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- State v. VaughanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- 66, Inc. v. Crestwood Commons Redevelopment Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Northgate Apartments v. City of North Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.