United States v. Kearns
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1Opinion of the Court
Judge OHLSON
delivered the opinion of the Court.
We granted review in this ease to determine whether the evidence adduced at trial was legally sufficient to prove that, under the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 2423(a) (2006), Appellant had the requisite intent to engage in criminal sexual activity with a minor when Appellant facilitated that minor’s travel in interstate commerce. We hold that the evidence of Appellant’s intent was legally sufficient, and thus we affirm his conviction under Specification 1 of Charge III.
During the relevant time period, Appellant was a twenty-two-year-old soldier…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Union Planters Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- United States v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
- United States v. OrtizCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
- United States v. FetrowCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
- United States v. Cimball SharptonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2014
- United States v. SimmermacherCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.