United States v. Cimball Sharpton
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Judge BAKER
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Appellant asserts that the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA) abused its discretion in finding legally sufficient evidence to support her conviction for larceny from the Air Force. Appellant argues that the victim in the case of credit card larceny is necessarily the bank issuing the card or the merchants selling the goods purchased. We disagree. In this ease, as in United States v. Lubasky, the victim of the larceny is the person or entity suffering the financial loss or deprived of the use or benefit of the property at…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. LubaskyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
- United States v. OliverCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2011
- United States v. KearnsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2014
- United States v. SharptonUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2013
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. GayUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015
- United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2016
- United States v. Private E2 ALVIN C. ENDSLEYArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
- United States v. CastroCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2021
- United States v. CortezNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.