Legal Opinion

United States v. Ortiz

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided April 17, 2017No. 16-0671/AFPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge STUCKY

delivered the opinion of the Court.

While he was serving as a judge on the United States Court of Military Commission Review (USCMCR), under an appointment by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate, Colonel Martin T. Mitchell simultaneously served as an appellate military judge on the panel of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA) that reviewed Appellant’s case. We granted review of two issues: (1) whether his simultaneous service on the two courts violated the Appointments Clause of the Constitution; and (2) whether he was statutorily barred…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. LaBonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Edmond v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. United States v. DickensonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  4. In re Al-NashiriCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  5. United States v. JanssenCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. United States v. HukillCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
  2. Ortiz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  3. United States v. EriksonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
  4. United States v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
  5. United States v. BriggsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API