Pierce v. Western Surety Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KANE, J.
Vehicle Code1 section 11710 requires a licensed motor vehicle retail dealer to procure and file a bond in the amount of $50,000. Any person who suffers a loss by reason of the dealer’s fraud has a right of action against the dealer and the surety on the bond in an amount not to exceed the value of the vehicle purchased. (§ 11711, subd. (a).)
Here, respondent Trenton Pierce made a section 11711 claim on the bond issued by appellant Western Surety Company (Western Surety) to Autorama, a licensed dealer. Western Surety eventually settled with Pierce. Thereafter, the trial court…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mexia v. Rinker Boat Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Mocek v. Alfa Leisure, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Unilogic, Inc. v. Burroughs Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- American Financial Services Ass'n v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Wang v. Massey ChevroletCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rojas v. Platinum Auto Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Harrelson v. Carmax Auto Superstores California CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Immigrant Rights Defense etc. v. Hudson Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 2022
- Karton v. Ari Design & ConstructionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- Karton v. Ari Design & Construction, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.