Legal Opinion

Wang v. Massey Chevrolet

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 21, 2002No. B147471PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LILLIE, P. J.

In this action alleging, inter alia, fraud in the inducement of an automobile lease, plaintiffs appeal from summary judgment granted in favor of defendant Massey Chevrolet (Massey) on their complaint for damages for fraud and violations of the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (Civ. Code, § 1750 et seq.), and for injunctive relief for unfair competition under Business and Professions Code section 17200. The principal issue on this appeal is whether the trial court properly determined that plaintiffs’ claims were barred by the parol evidence rule.

Factual and Procedural Background

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Alliance Mortgage Co. v. RothwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. DuBois v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. South Bay Chevrolet v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Tenzer v. Superscope, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Colgan v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. Bardin v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Casa Herrera, Inc. v. BeydounCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. McAdams v. MONIER, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Bruton v. Gerber Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API