Legal Opinion

Harrelson v. Carmax Auto Superstores California CA4/2

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 25, 2013No. E054435Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 9/25/13 Harrelson v. Carmax Auto Superstores California CA4/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO TIFFINI HARRELSON, Plaintiff and Appellant, E054435 v. (Super.Ct.No. CIVRS1104169) CARMAX AUTO…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Cortez v. Purolator Air Filtration Products Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Jenkins v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Campbell v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Jefferson v. J. E. French Co.California Supreme Court · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API