Legal Opinion

Rojas v. Platinum Auto Group, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 15, 2013No. B235956PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUBIN, Acting P. J.

Gonzalo Rojas appeals from the court’s judgment sustaining without leave to amend the first demurrers filed by defendants. We reverse as to defendants Platinum Auto Group, Inc., and Topaz Financial, Inc., affirm as to defendant State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, and remand for further proceedings.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

On September 20, 2010, appellant Gonzalo Rojas bought a car from respondent Platinum Auto Group, Inc., doing business as Platinum Motors (Platinum), a car dealership in Marina Del Rey. Appellant put no cash down the day he bought the car. Instead, he…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Stasher v. Harger-HaldemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Landry v. Berryessa Union School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Nelson v. Pearson Ford Co.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Century-National Insurance v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Raceway Ford CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Brooks v. Carmax Auto Superstores Cal., LLC, California Court of Appeal, 4th District2016
  3. Flannery v. VW Credit, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. 139 S. Occidental Blvd. v. Ha CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Brooks v. CarMax Auto SuperstoresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API