Legal Opinion

City of Salem v. Harding

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1929No. 21359PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C. J.

By his petition, plaintiff has grounded his action upon a claim of negligence on the part of the city, and has assigned eight different grounds of negligence. The error for which the Court of Appeals reversed relates to the act of the health officer of the city, in conjunction with an employe of the service department of the city, in plugging the outlet of the Brooks sewer and causing the water to recede until it acquired sufficient pressure to force its way through the intervening soil into the gravity line. There was evidence tending to show that, while the work was done by the health…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Aldrich v. City of YoungstownOhio Supreme Court · 1922
  2. City of Portsmouth v. Mitchell Manufacturing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Doud v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  2. City of Norwood v. SheenOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Hutchinson v. City of LakewoodOhio Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Bluhm v. Blanck & Gargaro, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. Safransky v. City of HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 1935

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API