Aldrich v. City of Youngstown
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, J.:
1. The creation and maintenance of a police department by a muunicipality are done in the exercise of its governmental functions. The performance of an act by an official of such department is not the performance of a ministerial act for which a municipality becomes liable under the maxim, respondeat superior.
2. A municipal corporation is not, in the absence of a statutory provision, liable in damages to one injured for the negligent acts of its police department, or any of its members.
(Fowler, Admx., v. City of Cleveland, 100 Ohio St., 158, overruled; Frederick, Admx., v. City of…
2Cited by53 opinions
- City of Wooster v. ArbenzOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- Hoggard v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
- Barker v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
- Russell W. Hanna v. Robert Drobnick, Building CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Hagerman v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1937
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.