Legal Opinion

Hutchinson v. City of Lakewood

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1932No. 23065PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

This case arises upon demurrer to the amended petition. The material portion of the amended petition set up that the defendant, the city of Lakewood, employed a certain construction company to construct for the city of Lakewood a sewer in Edge-water drive from Parkside avenue to Homewood drive, and a sewer in Homewood drive, and that during all periods covered by the petition the plaintiff was the owner of certain premises upon Lake avenue in Lakewood.

The petition also set up that the work done by the construction company was under the supervision of the authorities of the city, and that in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. SebenIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Harper v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. Aldrich v. City of YoungstownOhio Supreme Court · 1922
  4. City of Portsmouth v. Mitchell Manufacturing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1925
  5. City of Kansas City v. SlangstromSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. City of Norwood v. SheenOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  2. A1A Mobile Home Park, Inc. v. Brevard CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  3. Blankenship v. EnrightOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Bluhm v. Blanck & Gargaro, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. Safransky v. City of HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 1935

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API