Bluhm v. Blanck & Gargaro, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHornbeck, P. J.
Plaintiff instituted Ms action in the Common Pleas Court against the defendant for the recovery of property damages resulting from blasting operations conducted by the defendant as contractor in the construction of a sewer by the city of Columbus along an alley adjacent to the real estate of the plaintiff.
It is specifically averred in the amended petition that “on or about October 1, 1935, and for about three weeks thereafter, the defendant, while constructing said tunnel, loosed and removed the earth and rock therein by means of blasts of high powered explosives which said blasts .of said…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wymer-Harris Construction Co. v. GlassOhio Supreme Court · 1930
- Hutchinson v. City of LakewoodOhio Supreme Court · 1932
- City of Salem v. HardingOhio Supreme Court · 1929
- Goldman v. ReganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Whitla v. IppolitoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- MARTIN ET UX v. Reynolds Metals Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Bedell Et Ux. v. GoulterOregon Supreme Court · 1953
- Lowry Hill Properties, Inc. v. Ashbach Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Brown v. L. S. Lunder Construction Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
- Walczesky v. Horvitz Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.