Legal Opinion

City of Norwood v. Sheen

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1933No. 23552PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

It is strenuously urged on behalf of the city of Norwood that the decision in the case of Hutchinson v. City of Lakewood,125 Ohio St. 100, 180 N.E. 643, compels a reversal of this judgment. That case held that the construction of a sewer, in the absence of statute, by a municipality is a governmental function, and that no liability arises against such municipality for negligence in the performance of that function.

We have not here, however, the case of the construction of a sewer by a municipality, and hence the Hutchinson case does not apply. The sewer in question here was constructed by…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Francis v. . SchoellkopfNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. City of Ardmore v. OrrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Louisville, Henderson & St. Louis Railway Co. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  4. City of Portsmouth v. Mitchell Manufacturing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Faust v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Doner v. ZodyOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State ex rel. Shemo v. City of Mayfield HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Trautwein v. SorgenfreiOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Smith v. Erie Rd. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Doud v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1949

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API