Legal Opinion

Doud v. City of Cincinnati

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1949No. 31677PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

Two questions are suggested for determination by this court:(1) Can private property be appropriated to public use, in the absence of a formal dedication or statutory condemnation?(2) Is a municipality liable for damage to private property caused by the deterioration of a sewer which was adopted into the municipality’s sewer system, the condition of which sewer inspection at reasonable intervals would have disclosed?

It is conceded that there was no statutory appropriation of a private sewer originally constructed through the property of the plaintiff. However, the defendant tapped into the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Portsmouth v. Mitchell Manufacturing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1925
  2. City of Norwood v. SheenOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  3. City of Salem v. HardingOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Steinle v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Town of Central Covington v. BeiserCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania R. Co. v. City of GirardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
  2. State Ex Rel. Gilbert v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Essman v. PortsmouthOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. State ex rel. Levin v. SchrempOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Coleman v. Portage County EngineerOhio Supreme Court · 2012

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API