Legal Opinion
Agner v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided August 15, 1985No. Nos. 2-84C, 55-84CPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*636OPINION
MAYER, Judge.
Plaintiffs in these consolidated cases are 163 present or former members of the Special Police Force of the Library of Congress. They ask for a determination that their lunch breaks are not duty free as a matter of law under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219, and that compensated lunch time cannot be offset against uncompensated pre- and post-shift work to deprive them of overtime pay.
The case is before the court on cross-motions for partial summary judgment. By stipulation, the parties agree that if defendant prevails on the duty free lunch issue…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Kenneth J. Hill v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Glenn L. Martin Nebraska Co. v. CulkinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
- Baylor v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Bobo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Wahl v. City of Wichita, Kan.District Court, D. Kansas · 1989
- Riggs v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Bobo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Adams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.