Legal Opinion

Adams v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 27, 2005No. 90-162CPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BUSH, Judge.

The court has before it three pending motions for partial summary judgment on “driving time” overtime pay claims: Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of August 12, 2002 (Def.’s 2002 Mot.), Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding the “Driving Time” Issue of August 2, 2004 (Pis.’ 2004 Mot.) and Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of September 22, 2004 (Def.’s 2004 Mot.). In this court’s recent opinion deciding another partial summary judgment motion in this case, Adams v. United States, No. 90-162C and Consolidated Cases, slip…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. Bull v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  3. Abbey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  4. Abbey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  5. Easter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API