Legal Opinion
Bobo v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 18, 1997No. 96-176CPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MILLER, Judge.
This case is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for partial summary judgment.1 The issue for decision is whether time spent by Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) border patrol agent canine handlers (“plaintiffs”) commuting to and from work with their assigned canines is compensable under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-19 (1994) (the “FLSA”). Argument is deemed unnecessary.
FACTS
Plaintiffs are current and former INS border patrol agent canine handlers whose principal duties include responding to immigration related calls requiring the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Steiner v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Augustus v. ABM Security ServicesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- Bobo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Smith v. Aztec Well Servicing Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Adams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Dooley v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.