Legal Opinion

Riggs v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 23, 1990No. 131-89CPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

This action, brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (“FLSA”) for overtime pay, is presently pending on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. The parties’ initial motions for summary judgment are limited to the question of liability. Plaintiffs’ motion presents the apparently novel argument that certain regulations adopted by the Office of Personnel Management (“OPM”) concerning the “de minimis ” rule are fatally at odds *666with regulations of the Department of Labor (“DOL”) addressing the same subject. Defendant has subsequently moved to dismiss…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Bull v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  2. Abbey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  3. Gonzalez v. Farmington Foods, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
  4. Christofferson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  5. Abbey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API