Legal Opinion

Armour & Co. v. Wantock

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 4, 1944No. 73PublishedCited by 690 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jackson

Armour and Company, petitioner, has been held liable to certain employees for overtime, liquidated damages, and attorneys’ fees under the Fair Labor Standards Act. 140 F. 2d 356. The overtime in question is that spent on the employer’s premises as fireguards subject to call, but otherwise put to such personal use as sleeping or recreation. The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on facts of considerable similarity reached an opposite result, in Skidmore v. Swift & Co., 136 F. 2d 112, post, p. 134. To resolve the conflict we granted certiorari in both cases. 322 U. S. 723.

Armour and Company…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. McLeod v. ThrelkeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Overstreet v. North Shore Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by690 opinions

  1. Kisor v. WilkieSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. IBP, Inc. v. AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Social Security Board v. NierotkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Gemsco, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. McKnight v. Kimberly Clark Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998

685 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API