Legal Opinion
Wahl v. City of Wichita, Kan.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided November 13, 1989No. 88-1424-KPublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PATRICK F. KELLY, District Judge.
The plaintiffs in the present action are present and former police officers of Wichita, Kansas. The plaintiffs contend that the defendant, the City of Wichita, violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., by failing to provide compensation for the time spent by the officers during their meal breaks. They contend that the city also violated the FLSA by denying overtime pay to officers completing reports and performing other activities after the end of their shifts.
The parties have now filed opposing summary judgment…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Julie Alexander, Carmel G. Abbate, Bozeman Anderson v. City of Chicago, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Robert W. Kohlheim, Cross-Appellees v. Glynn County, Georgia, a Political Subdivision of the State of Georgia, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Avery v. City of TalladegaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Lamon v. City Of ShawneeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Lamon v. City of ShawneeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.