Legal Opinion
Higgins v. Karp
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 20, 1998No. SC 15435; SC 15441PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the trial court, in the hearing required by our remand in Higgins v. Karp, 239 Conn. 802, 811, 687 A.2d 539 (1997), properly excluded additional evidence on the issue of whether good cause existed to set aside defaults against Drzislav Coric, the administrator of the estate of Robert Freeman (hereafter referred to as the *498defendant), for failure to plead. The trial court concluded that: (1) our decision in Higgins mandated that the trial court, on remand, was limited to the record as it existed at the time of the first hearing…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Enron Oil Corp. v. DiakuharaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Action S.A. And Deltamar Establishment v. Marc Rich & Co., Inc. And Marc Rich, Marc RichCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- John F. Meehan and Robert W. Fink A/K/A Meehan & Fink v. John Snow and Judy SnowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Williams Ford, Inc. v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Gateway Co. v. DiNoiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Hurley v. Heart Physicians, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Frillici v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. WadeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Wright v. HuttConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.