Legal Opinion
Wright v. Hutt
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 22, 1998No. AC 17063PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, J.
The plaintiffs in this medical malpractice action, Jacqueline Wright and William Wright, appeal from the judgment in favor of the defendant. The plaintiffs claim that the trial court improperly refused to permit them to exercise a peremptory challenge to excuse a juror after the jury was impaneled but prior to its swearing in, and improperly ruled on the admissi*441bility of certain documentary and testimonial evidence. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. In 1986, the plaintiff Jacqueline Wright sought medical…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Logan v. Greenwich Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Telesco v. TelescoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. EspositoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. BovaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Matthews v. FMC CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- McCann Real Equities Series XXII, LLC v. David McDermott Chevrolet, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Holley v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Jenkins v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Monetary Funding Group, Inc. v. PluchinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Wyszomierski v. SiracusaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.