State v. Wade
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
This appeal requires us to consider the applicability and constitutionality of the “aggregate package” theory of sentencing (aggregate package theory) to the resentencing of a defendant after the partial reversal of a multicount conviction on the basis of insufficient evidence. The defendant, Sidney Wade, appeals 1 from the judgment of the trial court resentencing him to a total effective sentence of twenty-three years imprisonment, on remand from the judgment of the Appellate Court, which had reversed, in part, his conviction of manslaughter in the first degree in violation…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State v. GeislerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. LammeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Twigg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- State v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- State v. MICHAEL A.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. BellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- State v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.