Legal Opinion
Frillici v. Town of Westport
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 10, 2003No. SC 16820PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*268 Opinion
SULLIVAN, C. J.
This appeal arises out of protracted litigation concerning the exercise of jurisdiction by the named defendant, the town of Westport (town), over Cockenoe Flats, recreational clamming beds located off of the coast of the town. On July 8, 1987, the plaintiffs1 initiated this action against the defendants2 by means of a seven count complaint3 challenging the town’s exercise of jurisdiction. The trial court concluded that the town had jurisdiction over Cockenoe Flats and, accordingly, rendered judgment for the defendants on all counts. The plaintiffs appealed and, in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Beverly Hills Concepts, Inc. v. Schatz & Schatz, Ribicoff & KotkinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Frillici v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. AlvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Craig v. DriscollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- United Technologies Corp. v. Town of East WindsorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Poole v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Russell v. RussellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Carmel Hollow Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Town of BethlehemSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Broadnax v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.