Legal Opinion

Hurley v. Heart Physicians, P.C.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided September 14, 2010No. SC 18423PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VERTEFEUILLE, J.

This appeal arises out of proceedings following our remand to the trial court in Hurley v. Heart Physicians, P.C., 278 Conn. 305, 898 A.2d 777 (2006). In Hurley, we concluded that the trial court improperly had granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment as to the plaintiffs’ claim under the Connecticut Product Liability Act, General Statutes § 52-572m et seq., on the basis of the learned intermediary doctrine because of the existence of a disputed issue of material fact, and we remanded the case for a determination of that factual issue. Id., 309, 326. In the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. State v. PeelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  2. Aillon v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  3. Tough v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  4. Bauer v. Waste Management of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  5. Wiseman v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
  2. Gianetti v. NORWALK HOSP.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
  3. State v. CoccomoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  4. Smart v. CorbittConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  5. State v. TaboneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API