C074810Whitlow v. Rideout Memorial Hospital
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RAYE, P. J. —
The trial court granted defendant Rideout Memorial Hospital’s motion for summary judgment, finding that, as a matter of law, the emergency room physician who failed to diagnose and treat decedent’s brain hemorrhage was not an ostensible agent of the hospital. On appeal, the surviving children argue that, despite the hospital’s boilerplate admissions form and signage stating the emergency room physicians are independent contractors, they have presented triable issues of material fact whether their mother entrusted herself to the hospital, whether the hospital selected the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Sword v. NKC Hospitals, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Clark v. Southview Hospital & Family Health CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Quintal v. Laurel Grove HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- State ex rel. Maurer v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Markow v. RosnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Markow v. RosnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Arceo v. City of RosevilleDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Doe v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Franklin v. Santa Barbara Cottage HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.