Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Doe v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 22, 2019No. 3:19-cv-03310Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 JANE DOE, Case No.19-cv-03310-JSC 7 Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS 9 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 13, 19, 20 10 Defendants. 11 12 Jane Doe brings tort claims against Uber after she was assaulted by a former Uber driver 13 posing as a current Uber driver. Uber and its wholly owned subsidiaries Rasier, LLC and Rasier 14 CA, LLC (collectively “Uber”) move to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 15 Procedure 12(b)(6).1 (Dkt. No. 13.) After careful consideration of the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Lisa M. v. Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Farmers Insurance Group v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Squaw Valley Ski Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Xue Lu v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API