Legal Opinion

Quintal v. Laurel Grove Hospital

California Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1964No. S. F. 21771PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from judgments notwithstanding the verdicts, and from alternative orders granting all defendants a new trial. In our opinion the judgments notwithstanding the verdicts must be reversed, and the orders granting a new trial must be affirmed.

The case revolves around the tragic experiences of plaintiff, Reginald Quintal (Reggie), who, in July of 1960, when the events here involved occurred, was 6 years of age. Prior to July 11, 1960, Reggie was a normal, healthy child, suffering only from an inward deviation of the eyes. On July 10, 1960, he entered the defendant hospital for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Siverson v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Yarrow v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Riskin v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Hauter v. ZogartsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Lisa M. v. Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API