Quintal v. Laurel Grove Hospital
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from judgments notwithstanding the verdicts, and from alternative orders granting all defendants a new trial. In our opinion the judgments notwithstanding the verdicts must be reversed, and the orders granting a new trial must be affirmed.
The case revolves around the tragic experiences of plaintiff, Reginald Quintal (Reggie), who, in July of 1960, when the events here involved occurred, was 6 years of age. Prior to July 11, 1960, Reggie was a normal, healthy child, suffering only from an inward deviation of the eyes. On July 10, 1960, he entered the defendant hospital for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
- Siverson v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Yarrow v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Riskin v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Hauter v. ZogartsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Lisa M. v. Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.