Legal Opinion
Arceo v. City of Roseville
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 31, 2023No. 2:20-cv-02334Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALEJANDRO ARCEO, No. 2:20-cv-02334-DAD-DB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER AND 14 CITY OF ROSEVILLE, et al., SUTTER HEALTH’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 15 Defendants. (Doc. No. 68) 16 17 This matter is before the court on the motion for summary judgment filed on behalf of 18 defendants Sutter Roseville Medical Center (“SRMC”) and Sutter Health (collectively, “moving 19 defendants”) on May 24, 2022. (Doc. No. 68.) That motion was taken under submission…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Robin Orr v. Bank of America, Nt & SaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.