Legal Opinion

Clark v. Southview Hospital & Family Health Center

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1994No. 92-2194PublishedCited by 113 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.

We must determine whether the trial court should have directed a verdict in favor of Southview on the issue of agency by estoppel.

Civ.R. 50(A)(4) provides that:

‘When a motion for a directed verdict has been properly made, the trial court, after construing the evidence most strongly in favor of the party against whom the motion is directed, finds that upon any determinative issue reasonable minds could come to but one conclusion upon the evidence submitted and that conclusion is adverse to such party, the court shall sustain the motion and direct a verdict for the moving party as to that…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Schloendorff v. Society of the New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Gilbert v. Sycamore Municipal HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Hill v. St. Clare's HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Paintsville Hospital Co. v. RoseKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Bing v. ThunigNew York Court of Appeals · 1957

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by113 opinions

  1. Comer v. RiskoOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. Harper (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Hudson v. Petrosurance, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Sword v. NKC Hospitals, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Natl. Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA v. WuerthOhio Supreme Court · 2009

108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API