Legal Opinion

Bayle-Lacoste & Co. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 29, 1941No. Civ. 11788PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

This is a proceeding in mandamus to compel the respondent court to dismiss an action pending therein for failure to bring it to trial within five years after the filing of the complaint. (Code Civ. Proc., see. 583.)

The action, brought by the people of the State of California by and through the Department of Public Works to condemn a right of way for highway purposes, was filed and summons issued on December 27, 1933. There were named as defendants approximately six individuals, ten corporations, five John Does and four fictitiously named corporations. Petitioner herein was not designated as a…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Bank of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Christin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Miller & Lux Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Rosefield Packing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Crane v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Woley v. TurkusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Greif v. DulleaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Sparks Construction, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Big Bear Mun. Water Dist. v. Superior Court of San Bernardino Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1969

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API