Legal Opinion

Caminetti v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1943No. L. A. 17678PublishedCited by 115 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

In 1936, the business and assets of the Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company of California (hereafter called the “old company”) were taken over by the Insurance Commissioner of this state pursuant to statutory authority. (Ins. Code, §§ 1011 and 1013.) Thereafter, respondent Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company (hereafter called the “new company”) was organized as part of a plan of rehabilitation of the old company by the commissioner who purchased its entire capital stock with assets of the old company. Pursuant to section 1043 of the Insurance Code, a “Rehabilitation and Reinsurance”…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. City of GoldsboroSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by115 opinions

  1. People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Solberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Avco Community Developers, Inc. v. South Coast Regional CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Clean Air Constituency v. California State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Mosk v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API