Neblett v. Carpenter
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Roberts
The questions raised are whether proceedings for the rehabilitation of an insurance company, pursuant to the Insurance Code of California, 1 unconstitutionally deprive policy holders of their property without due process of law, or impair the obligation of their contracts. 2
For many years the Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company of California has written life, health, and accident insurance. Since 1918 it has issued noncancelable health and accident policies. The Insurance Commissioner of California determined that, while the life and general health and accident business was in sound…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Carpenter v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- West v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Ohio Ex Rel. Bryant v. Akron Metropolitan Park DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Standard Oil Co. of Ind. v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Caminetti v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. McConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Kueckelhan v. Federal Old Line InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- Shutts v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1977
- Foster v. Mutual Fire, Marine & Inland InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.