Legal Opinion

Barton v. McDermott

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 18, 1930No. Docket No. 67PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAINES, J., pro tem.

During the times here involved appellants Julius Anderson and Elmer L. Aldrich have, as copartners, conducted at San Diego, California, a laundry business under the name “San Diego Steam Laundry”, and appellant Albert J. Anderson has been employed by them as their superintendent and manager. Defendant Charles McDermott was, immediately prior to and at the time of the occurrences under discussion, employed as a driver by another San Diego laundry engaged exclusively in laundering overalls. His duties were to operate a truck between. San Diego and El Centro in the Imperial…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ryder v. BambergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Ryan v. FarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. May v. FarrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. MacDermot v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Kruse v. White BrothersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Malloy v. FongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Theodore J. Chapin and Adam Sydlik v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  3. Thoreau v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Swing v. LingoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API