Legal Opinion

Swing v. Lingo

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 7, 1933No. Docket No. 665PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

Plaintiffs brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by them as a result of a collision between a motorcycle on which they were riding and an automobile truck which was driven by the defendant Lingo. The action was tried before the court without a jury and resulted in the rendition of a judgment in favor of plaintiffs against the defendant Lingo and a denial of recovery as to the defendant J. W. Cramp. Plaintiffs have appealed from that portion of the judgment which denied them recovery from defendant Cramp.

The court found that the collision between the motor…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Callet v. AliotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Breeze v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Paine v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Brown v. Chevrolet Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Sly v. American Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Baugh v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Weber v. PinyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Peterson v. Grieger, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Bunch v. KinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Bayless v. MullCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API