Ryder v. Bamberger
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Flint, Gray & Barker, L. W. Jutten, Frank P. Deering, Joseph D. Redding, and Henry S. Van Dyke, for Appellant. W. E. Mitchell, Hunsaker & Britt, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, and Henry Ach, for Respondents.
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff's action is for damages for fraud. The gravamen of his complaint is that he was a stockholder in the Salt Lake Oil Company, and was induced by the misrepresentations and concealments of the defendants to sell his stock for two dollars a share, when in truth and in fact it was worth very much more. He lays his damages in the sum of $21,671. Certain of the defendants, and principally the defendants Bamberger, Wood, Price, and Phillips, are specifically charged with the active perpetration and consummation of the frauds, while certain other of the defendants, Chanslor and Porter, while…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Strong v. RepideSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Levy v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Casey v. LeggettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Thomas v. Visalia Electric R.R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by75 opinions
- Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co.California Supreme Court · 1969
- Liodas v. SahadiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- William J. Emmett, Administrator of the Estate of Joseph N. Emmett v. Eastern Dispensary and Casualty HospitalCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Shapiro v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Robbins v. Pacific Eastern Corp.California Supreme Court · 1937
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.