Legal Opinion

Kruse v. White Brothers

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 27, 1927No. Docket No. 5464PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCashin, J.

Appeals by defendants from a judgment entered on a verdict for the plaintiffs in an action to recover for personal injuries.

E. A. Kruse is the husband of Madeline C. Kruse, and the latter—who will be hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff—while crossing a public highway known as the Alameda, near its intersection with Tosemite Avenue in Berkeley, Alameda County, was injured by an automobile owned by the corporation defendant and operated by Meyer, one of its employees. As grounds for reversal of the judgment it is urged by appellant corporation that the evidence is insufficient to sustain a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Ritchie v. WallerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  4. Kish v. California State Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Healey v. CockrillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Westberg v. WilldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Loper v. MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Birkner v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Ryan v. FarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Gipson v. Davis Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API