Legal Opinion
Talbot v. Myrtle Beach Board of Adjustment
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided August 12, 1952No. 16659PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Stukes, Justice.
The municipality of Myrtle Beach enacted in 1947 a zoning ordinance under the authority of Sections 7390 et seq. of the Code of 1942. At that time the appellants, who are husband and wife, owned and operated (and now do) a motor court at the northwest corner of 38th Avenue and U. S. Highway 17, commonly called the King’s Highway and the principal thoroughfare of the town. The wife, the appellant Lula E. Talbot, owned vacant contiguous lots across 38th Avenue from the motor court which included, as described in the pleadings, lot No. 2 of block 11-K of King’s Highway Extension…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- City of Des Moines v. Manhattan Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Douglass v. Council of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
- Schloemer v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Fontaine v. PeitzSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- Restaurant Row Associates v. Horry CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Bob Jones University, Inc. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
- Gurganious v. City of BeaufortCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
- Hodge v. POLLOCKSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1953
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.