Legal Opinion
Restaurant Row Associates v. Horry County
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided May 17, 1999No. 24944PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TOAL, Justice:
This case is on appeal from the Court of Appeals’ decision upholding the denial of Petitioner’s zoning variance. We affirm as modified.
Factual/Procedural Background
Petitioners Restaurant Row Associates and the Afterdeck d/b/a Thee DollHouse (“Thee DollHouse”) began its adult entertainment business in Horry County (“the County”) in March 1988. On September 30, 1989, the County adopted Ordinance 92-89, establishing adult entertainment zoning regulations. Ordinance 92-89, now codified in the Horry County Zoning Code as section 526, granted a six-year amortization period to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Rush v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
- Talbot v. Myrtle Beach Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Harkins v. Greenville CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Trumbull Falls, LLC v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- City of Columbia v. Pic-A-Flick Video, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Austin v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Clear Channel Outdoor v. City of Myrtle BeachSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.