Legal Opinion
Hodge v. POLLOCK
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided May 4, 1953No. 16740PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Oxner, justice.
The question presented on this appeal is whether, upon the record in this case, there are shown the requisite elements which would authorize the Board of Adjustment to grant a variance in the application of a zoning regulation of the City of Spartanburg providing that no building shall be constructed closer to the side line of a lot than six feet, so as to permit a property owner to construct an office building within three and a half feet of such line.
Under the terms of the zoning ordinances of Spartanburg, the Board of Adjustment is authorized to grant “such variance from the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. StoddardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Devaney v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Lee v. . Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- St. Patrick's Church Corporation v. DanielsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Matter of Hickox v. GriffinNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Restaurant Row Associates v. Horry CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Gurganious v. City of BeaufortCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
- Vulcan Materials Co. v. Greenville County Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
- Fairfield Ocean Ridge, Inc. v. Town of Edisto BeachCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
- Peterson Outdoor Advertising v. City of Myrtle BeachSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.