Legal Opinion

Fontaine v. Peitz

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 6, 1987No. 22699PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Chief Justice:

This is an appeal from an order which upheld the Charleston Board of Adjustment’s denial of a zoning variance requested by appellant Fontaine. We remand for further proceedings.

Fontaine bought a home at 37 State Street in Charleston in 1958. Through the years, Fontaine occasionally rented rooms to visitors on a “bed and breakfast” arrangement. In 1984, the City of Charleston adopted a zoning ordinance which required a business license for the operation of bed and breakfast establishments.

Fontaine applied for a business license, asserting he quálified under the provisions…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Calloway v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Capps v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Renney v. Dobbs House, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  4. Talbot v. Myrtle Beach Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  5. Niggel v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Clark v. CantrellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Bayle v. South Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  3. Fields v. Regional Medical Center OrangeburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  4. Ellis v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  5. State v. MansfieldCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API