Legal Opinion
Schloemer v. City of Louisville
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided October 6, 1944PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Sums
Affirming.
Al J. and Louis Sehloemer, appellants and plaintiffs below, filed their petition in equity in the Jefferson Circuit Court against the Building Inspector, the Board of Adjustment and Appeals and the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Louisville, asking that the Board require the Inspector to grant them a permit to erect a gasoline filling station on a lot they own in. a residential zone. The chancellor approved the full and well-considered report of his referee, Hon. William F. Clark, which recommended that the ruling of the Board refusing…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Arverne Bay Construction Co. v. ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Fowler v. Obier, City Building InspectorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Darlington v. Board of Councilmen of FrankfortCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
- City of Dallas v. LivelyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- American Beauty Homes Corp. v. Louisville & Jefferson County Planning & Zoning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
- Baum v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
- Talbot v. Myrtle Beach Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
- City of Richlawn v. McMakinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1950
- Boyd v. Louisville & Jefferson County Planning & Zoning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1949
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.