Legal Opinion

Domar Electric, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1994No. S036526PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

We granted review in this case to determine whether a city charter requirement that contracts subject to competitive bidding be awarded to the “lowest and best regular responsible bidder” prevents the charter city and its agencies from requiring potential contractors to comply with a subcontractor outreach program that involves no bid preferences, set-asides or quotas. Our examination of the relevant charter provisions and the purposes underlying the goals of competitive bidding leads us to conclude that the outreach program does not violate the charter. Accordingly, we…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Burden v. SnowdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. City and County of San Francisco v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Harman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Johnson v. BradleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. San Francisco Airports CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Wilson v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Rossi v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Hi-Voltage Wire Works, Inc. v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Roy Allan Slurry Seal, Inc. v. Am. Asphalt S., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2017

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API