Legal Opinion

City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 23, 1989No. 87-998PublishedCited by 1,118 opinions

1Judgment of the CourtJustice O’Connor

In this case, we confront once again the tension between the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of equal treatment to all citizens, and the use of race-based measures to amelio*477rate the effects of past discrimination on the opportunities enjoyed by members of minority groups in our society. In Fullilove v. Klutznick, 448 U. S. 448 (1980), we held that a congressional program requiring that 10% of certain federal construction grants be awarded to minority contractors did not violate the equal protection principles embodied in the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Relying largely on our…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,118 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Ricci v. DeStefanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

1,113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API