Roy Allan Slurry Seal, Inc. v. Am. Asphalt S., Inc.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.
*509 To prove the tort of intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, a plaintiff must establish "the existence of an economic relationship with some third party that contains the probability of future economic benefit to the plaintiff." ( Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp. (2003) 29 Cal.4th 1134 , 1164, 131 Cal.Rptr.2d 29 , 63 P.3d 937 ( Korea Supply ).) Here we decide whether such a relationship exists between a bidder for a public works contract and the public entity soliciting bids. Plaintiffs alleged that they had submitted the second lowest bids on several *510…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990
- Della Penna v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Deerpoint Grp., Inc. v. Agrigenix, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Redfearn v. Trader Joe's Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- San Diego Unified Sch. Dist. v. Yee, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- 7EDU Impact Academy Inc. v. YouDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
- A-Tek Mechanical, Inc. v. KHW Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2022
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.