Legal Opinion

Roy Allan Slurry Seal, Inc. v. Am. Asphalt S., Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 2017No. S225398PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.

*509 To prove the tort of intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, a plaintiff must establish "the existence of an economic relationship with some third party that contains the probability of future economic benefit to the plaintiff." ( Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp. (2003) 29 Cal.4th 1134 , 1164, 131 Cal.Rptr.2d 29 , 63 P.3d 937 ( Korea Supply ).) Here we decide whether such a relationship exists between a bidder for a public works contract and the public entity soliciting bids. Plaintiffs alleged that they had submitted the second lowest bids on several *510…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Della Penna v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Deerpoint Grp., Inc. v. Agrigenix, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
  2. Redfearn v. Trader Joe's Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. San Diego Unified Sch. Dist. v. Yee, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. 7EDU Impact Academy Inc. v. YouDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
  5. A-Tek Mechanical, Inc. v. KHW Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2022

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API