Wilson v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROWN, J.
We consider in this case whether the lowest responsible bidder that is wrongfully denied a public contract has a cause of action for monetary damages against the public entity, and if so, whether those damages include bid preparation costs and lost profits. We conclude bid preparation costs but not lost profits are available under a theory of promissory estoppel. We therefore reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeal.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
In April 1994, the Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) solicited bids to build the Red Line…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Burden v. SnowdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Keco Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Heyer Products Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
- Drennan v. Star Paving Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
- County of San Diego v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- Fontenot v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- West v. JPMorgan Chase BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Ragland v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- US Ecology, Inc. v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Jordan v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.