Legal Opinion
Medart, Inc. v. Richard G. Austin, Administrator, General Services Administration
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 24, 1992No. 20-1815PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, Circuit Judge.
Medart, Inc. appeals the decision of the General Services Administration Board of Contract Appeals, 91-2 B.C.A. (CCH) 1123,-741, 1991 WL 15456 (1991), rejecting its demand for reimbursement of losses incurred in the performance of a requirements contract because of variance between actual orders and the government’s estimated requirements. We affirm.
Background
The underlying facts are essentially undisputed. On January 30, 1985, the General Services Administration (GSA) issued a solicitation for bids on a requirements contract to supply gray metal storage and wardrobe…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Travis T. Womack, Jr. And John R. Vorhies, Formerly Partners of Petroleum Ownership Map Company (A Dissolved Partnership) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Shader Contractors, Inc. And Citizens National Bank of Orlando, Assignee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
- Clearwater Forest Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Chemical Technology, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
3Cited by40 opinions
- Hi-Shear Technology Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense v. Applied Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Technical Assistance International, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Crown Laundry & Dry Cleaners, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Schweiger Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.