Legal Opinion
Hi-Shear Technology Corporation v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 15, 2004No. 03-5077PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHALL, Circuit Judge.
This suit arises from two spare parts requirements contracts between the United States Army Communications & Electronics Command (“CECOM”) and Hi-Shear Technology Corporation (“Hi-Shear”). Following a trial, the Court of Federal Claims held that CECOM had breached the contracts by negligently overestimating in its invitations for bids (“IFBs”) the number of spare parts that would be required during the contract period. Hi-Shear Tech. Corp. v. United States, 53 Fed.Cl. 420, 422 (2002). The court awarded Hi-Shear damages in the amount of $17,793.56, plus interest. Id. at…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Reflectone, Inc. v. John H. Dalton, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Glendale Federal Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Bluebonnet Savings Bank, F.S.B., Stone Capital, Inc. (Formerly Known as Cfsb Corporation), and James M. Fail v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- California Federal Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- California Federal Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Magnum Opus Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Franconia Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Supreme Foodservice Gmbh v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Graves ex rel. Estate of Graves v. Secretary of the Dept. of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.